What could go wrong

Kaspa risks and open questions

The case for Kaspa is seven separate claims; any one can fail while the rest hold.

Seven risks, and what would settle each one

Verification cost

Ten blocks a second raise the bandwidth, CPU, and disk a node needs; push far enough and only well-funded operators can check it.

Settled by many separate node, API, explorer, and indexer operators, not fast blocks alone.

Security budget

New coins pay miners, shrinking on a schedule fees aren't replacing: as income falls, so does attack cost.

Settled by fee demand replacing new coins. Price the gap below.

External cost

Proof-of-work security is bought with electricity, chips, and supply chains; a faster chain doesn't shrink that bill.

Nothing settles this one: the price of the security model, paid daily.

Liquidity

Market depth, custody, and exchange support don't follow from good design; they take years of money and legal work.

Settled by getting in and out, holding your own keys, trading at depth, not holder counts or volume.

Mining concentration

A few firms control ASICRuns kHeavyHash fast; can't be reprogrammed. supply; pools and geography still cluster into few hands, open protocol or not.

Settled by production spread across many addresses over long windows. No premine doesn't mean no early concentration: fair-launch comparison.

Roadmap execution

Toccata activated on mainnet; vProgs, DAGKnight, and native DeFi are separate tracks, separate timelines. A testnet demo of one isn't evidence for the others.

Settled by a mainnet release with proof it activated: wallets, indexers, accepted transactions, repeat use. Status tracks each.

User demand

Low fees and spare room are what apps need to exist, not proof anyone uses one twice.

Settled by people returning because an app beats an ordinary server.

Try it

Who pays Kaspa's miners

Miners sell hash power to whoever pays; total pay falls, hash rate follows, so does attack cost.

today
82,023

Jump to

0.0089%

of miner pay comes from fees

0.001%0.01%0.1%1%10%100%
New coins
$58,358 a day
Fees
$5.17 a day
Gap
fees are 11,293x too small

New coins at $0.0292121 (22 Aug 2026 CoinGecko), held flat; schedule steps down 5.61%/month, halving every 12. Fees at measured median $0.000063.

Source: this site's twenty-chain dataset, Kaspa row, 22 Aug 2026; rusty-kaspa's coinbase.rs; emission demo.

Not Kaspa-specific: Bitcoin has run the same subsidy its whole life, still the priciest chain to attack. Watch whether the gap closes. Attack-cost calculator prices the other side.

What to watch

Separate node/API/indexer counts. Roadmap items becoming apps with repeat users, not demos. How fast live/testnet/roadmap/research flatten into one hype story. Price/hash-rate version: the mining cycle.